Current:Home > FinanceAppeals courts temporarily lifts Trump’s gag order as he fights the restrictions on his speech -MarketMind
Appeals courts temporarily lifts Trump’s gag order as he fights the restrictions on his speech
View
Date:2025-04-20 19:02:00
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court temporarily lifted a gag order on Donald Trump in his 2020 election interference case in Washington on Friday — the latest twist in the legal fight over the restrictions on the former president’s speech.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit decision puts a hold on the limited gag order to give the judges time to consider Trump’s request for a longer pause on the restrictions while his appeals play out. The appeals court said the temporary pause “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” of Trump’s bid.
The court set oral arguments for Nov. 20 before a panel of three judges — all appointees of Democratic presidents.
An attorney for Trump declined to comment on Friday.
The gag order, imposed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, bars Trump from making public statements targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses in the case accusing him of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election he lost to President Joe Biden. It still allows the former president to assert his innocence and his claims that the case against him is politically motivated.
Chutkan, who was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama reimposed the gag order on Sunday, after prosecutors pointed to Trump’s recent social media comments about his former chief of staff Mark Meadows.
It’s the most serious restriction a court has put on the speech of the GOP presidential primary frontrunner and criminal defendant in four separate cases. Gag orders are not unheard of in high-profile cases, but courts have never had to wrestle before with whether they can curtail the speech of a presidential candidate.
Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has said Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric about those involved in the case threatens to undermine public confidence in the judicial system and influence potential witnesses who could be called to testify.
Trump’s lawyers say they will go to the Supreme Court, if necessary, to fight what they say are unconstitutional restrictions on his political speech. The defense has said prosecutors have provided no evidence that potential witnesses or anyone else felt intimidated by the former president’s social media posts.
Appeals court Judges Brad Garcia, Patricia Millett and Cornelia Pillard will hear the case.
Garcia is a former Justice Department official who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan and was appointed to the bench last May by Biden. Millett is an Obama appointee who, before becoming a judge, argued several dozen cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Pillard was appointed to the court by Obama after serving as a Justice Department lawyer and professor at Georgetown University’s law school.
The appeals court could ultimately uphold the gag order or find that the restrictions imposed by Chutkan went too far. Either way, the issue is likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court, although there’s no guarantee the justices would take up the matter.
____
Richer reported from Boston.
veryGood! (21737)
Related
- Charges: D'Vontaye Mitchell died after being held down for about 9 minutes
- Motocross star Jayden 'Jayo' Archer, the first to land triple backflip, dies practicing trick
- Robert Port, who led AP investigative team that won Pulitzer for No Gun Ri massacre probe, dies
- In wake of mass shooting, here is how Maine’s governor wants to tackle gun control and mental health
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Charges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time
- Slayer, Mötley Crüe, Judas Priest, Slipknot set to play Louder Than Life in Louisville
- California lawmakers say reparations bills, which exclude widespread payments, are a starting point
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Lionel Messi and Inter Miami open 2024 MLS season: Must-see pictures from Fort Lauderdale
Ranking
- Hidden Home Gems From Kohl's That Will Give Your Space a Stylish Refresh for Less
- Maleesa Mooney Case: Suspect Facing Murder Charges for Death of Model Found in Refrigerator
- 8 players suspended from Texas A&M-Commerce, Incarnate Word postgame brawl
- Curb your Messi Mania expectations in 2024. He wants to play every match, but will he?
- NCAA hits former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh with suspension, show-cause for recruiting violations
- China plans to send San Diego Zoo more pandas this year, reigniting its panda diplomacy
- Audrii Cunningham case timeline: From her disappearance to suspect's arrest
- Lawyers for Malcolm X family say new statements implicate NYPD, feds in assassination
Recommendation
NCAA President Charlie Baker would be 'shocked' if women's tournament revenue units isn't passed
7 people hospitalized after fire in Chicago high-rise building
Rick Pitino walks back harsh criticism as St. John's snaps losing skid
James Biden, Joe Biden's brother, tells lawmakers the president had no involvement in family's business dealings
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Federal lawsuit alleges harrowing conditions, abuse in New Jersey psychiatric hospitals
Leaked document trove shows a Chinese hacking scheme focused on harassing dissidents
‘Little dark secret': DEA agent on trial accused of taking $250K in bribes from Mafia